Good vs. Evil in John Cheevers The Five-Forty-Eight Essay -- Five-For

Great versus Underhanded in John Cheever's The Five-Forty-Eight John Cheever was an honor winning American creator of the twentieth century. His work regularly had 'mental and strict vision' with focal topics of 'transgression, misleading, and reclamation' (Kennedy, 551). Cheever's short story entitled 'The Five-Forty-Eight' depicts a battle of good versus fiendish. Following the topics of wrongdoing, double dealing, and reclamation, we read of a young lady (great) looking for vengeance for the fiendishness done to her. Through the course of the story the peruser can recognize the characteristics of good and abhorrence. The Webster's word reference characterizes underhanded as 'that which is ethically off-base.' Blake has some unmistakable profound quality issues. Blake, the insidious power in the story, has many character defects that are characteristic of the power he depicts. He is self-ingested, manipulative, and shallow and has secluded himself from his loved ones. Blake forfeits his connections to surrender to his sexual wants, which is our first sign of his shrewd streak. He lays down with Mrs. Mark, his secretary, and continues to fire her. Because of Blake?s numerous one night of stands, where he controls ladies to lay down with him, he loses his better half, child, and companions. He is so fantastically shallow and self-included that he wedded his significant other for her excellence alone; he has no fascination in her in her mature age. He doesn't claim to adore his significant other ?the physical charms that had been her lone fascination were no more? (554). His neighbors and companions know about the underhanded Blake has never really own better half, and thus they dismiss Blake as a companion. His self-included mentality keeps him from caring that he has no friends. At the point when his neighbor, Mrs. Compton, can't give him an authentic grin, we r... ...relationship. Cheever?s distraction with transgression and duplicity is happened in the story. Works Cited Cheever, John. ?The Five-Forty-Eight.? Writing: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. eighth ed. New York: Longman, 2002. 550-561. Chesnick, Eugene. ?The Domesticated Stroke of John Cheever.? Ed. Dedria Bryfonski. Contemporary Literary Criticism. Vol. 7 of 46. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company, 1980. 48. Oates, Joyce Carol. Article on John Cheever. Ed. Dedria Bryfonski. Contemporary Literary Criticism. Vol. 11 of 46. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company, 1980. 119-120. The New Webster?s Dictionary. New York: Lexicon Publications, Inc., 1990. 135. Tyler, Anne. Article on John Cheever. Ed. Dedria Bryfonski. Contemporary Literary Criticism. Vol. 11 of 46. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company, 1980. 121.

Julius Caesar - Summary Of Act I-v :: essays research papers

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a play about devotion, selling out, adoration, and duplicity. There are numerous characters with decently inside and out characters. A portion of the principle characters are Cassius, the sly, misleading, clever man who is the pioneer of the intrigue that executed Caesar. Brutus, the respectable, legit, good man who is one of the key individuals from the trick. There is additionally Antony, who is Caesar’s right hand man. He is clever and merciless man, ready to effectively seek retribution for Caesar’s demise. Act I is based on presenting the play and a portion of its characters. The play opens around a horde of individuals hanging tight for Caesar’s return after his triumph over Pompey’s children. As the procession walks by, a seer offers Caesar to "beware the ides of March." Later in Act I, Cassius convinces the terrified Casca to join the intrigue during a rough tempest. The two of them intend to visit Brutus later with counterfeit petitions to help convince Brutus to join the scheme. Act II opens with Brutus examining whether to join the connivance or not when Lucius brings Brutus one of Cassius’s petitions. Cassius and five different plotters enter. Brutus consents to turn into a plotter, however will not make and vow, remembering Cicero for the trick, and slaughtering Mark Antony. Brutus at that point leaves with Caius Ligarius for the Capitol. Later toward the beginning of the day, Caesar’s spouse, Calpurnia, asks Caesar not to go to the Capitol. He is at last convinced to pass by Decius. Imprint Antony and the backstabbers enter, and they all leave for the Capitol together. In transit, Artemidorus attempts to caution Caesar of his approaching passing with a letter, which never makes it to Caesar. Portia sends her hireling, Lucius, to the Capitol for news while she talks with a diviner who will attempt to caution Caesar a subsequent time. In Act III, Caesar, alongside the plotters, advances toward the Capitol. The diviner and Artimedorus both attempt to caution Caesar without much of any result. He is murdered at the Capitol, wounded first by Casca with the words "Speak, hands, for me!" All the schemers aside from Brutus follow Casca’s lead and cut Caesar. Caesar attempts to battle off all the blows until he sees Brutus’s raised knife. Caesar bites the dust after Brutus cuts him with the words, "Et tu, Brutè? At that point fall, Caesar!" Brutus at that point clarifies the schemers explanations behind murdering Caesar at his memorial service. Julius Caesar - Summary Of Act I-v :: papers look into papers The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a play about devotion, treachery, love, and double dealing. There are numerous characters with reasonably inside and out characters. A portion of the fundamental characters are Cassius, the sly, misleading, clever man who is the pioneer of the connivance that slaughtered Caesar. Brutus, the respectable, genuine, good man who is one of the key individuals from the connivance. There is likewise Antony, who is Caesar’s right hand man. He is wise and savage man, ready to effectively seek retribution for Caesar’s passing. Act I is revolved around presenting the play and a portion of its characters. The play opens around a horde of individuals sitting tight for Caesar’s return after his triumph over Pompey’s children. As the procession walks by, a diviner offers Caesar to "beware the ides of March." Later in Act I, Cassius convinces the scared Casca to join the connivance during a rough tempest. The two of them intend to visit Brutus later with counterfeit petitions to help convince Brutus to join the intrigue. Act II opens with Brutus mulling over whether to join the scheme or not when Lucius brings Brutus one of Cassius’s petitions. Cassius and five different backstabbers enter. Brutus consents to turn into a backstabber, yet will not make and vow, remembering Cicero for the scheme, and executing Mark Antony. Brutus at that point leaves with Caius Ligarius for the Capitol. Later toward the beginning of the day, Caesar’s spouse, Calpurnia, asks Caesar not to go to the Capitol. He is at long last convinced to pass by Decius. Imprint Antony and the schemers enter, and they all leave for the Capitol together. In transit, Artemidorus attempts to caution Caesar of his looming demise with a letter, which never makes it to Caesar. Portia sends her worker, Lucius, to the Capitol for news while she talks with a seer who will attempt to caution Caesar a subsequent time. In Act III, Caesar, alongside the plotters, advances toward the Capitol. The seer and Artimedorus both attempt to caution Caesar without any result. He is murdered at the Capitol, wounded first by Casca with the words "Speak, hands, for me!" All the backstabbers aside from Brutus follow Casca’s lead and cut Caesar. Caesar attempts to fight off all the blows until he sees Brutus’s raised knife. Caesar kicks the bucket after Brutus cuts him with the words, "Et tu, Brutè? At that point fall, Caesar!" Brutus at that point clarifies the schemers explanations behind executing Caesar at his memorial service.

Analysts dispersion forecast Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Experts scattering conjecture - Essay Example Expert conjectures allude to open reports or declarations made by examiners on security valuation. The conjectures accentuate the qualities and worries from their investigation of the data of the Company and are regularly utilized by the speculators as signs of the heading and target cost of a fundamental security. Thus, they have a genuine material effect on the development of the security. In order to assess the effects of these gauges on a total premise, our supervisory group has centered their examination in Analyst Forecast Dispersion. So as to quantify financial specialist notion of a hidden security, Analyst Forecast Dispersion quantifies the distinction in investigator sentiments. A huge measure or an expansion in scattering means that there is more prominent total vulnerability in examiner sees concerning the course and the objective cost of a basic security, and the other way around. The security is relied upon to create lower returns because of the less assurance as to the characteristic worth; this in actuality demonstrates a negative relationship between's future returns and the Analytical Forecast Dispersion. Toward the start, this report looks at the recorded information for security returns and the Analyst Forecast Dispersion between the period 1983-2005. Having inspected the chronicled information, we will at that point recognize the significance of the connection between the two factors in order to drive a fitting exchanging system. In light of our investigation, there is adequate exact proof affirming our speculation that there is a huge negative connection between the two factors for the supported portfolios and the Fama-MacBeth examination for the littler top firms. Hence, in this manner, out group would wish to propose a momentary energy procedure through a short situation in protections that have high scattering and a long scattering in protections with low scattering. The methodology will concentrate on little to-medium top measured firms on a one month

To what extent has realism dominated the study of security Essay

What exactly degree has authenticity commanded the investigation of security - Essay Example Force is an idea essentially thought of in the points of view of material assets important to pressure or instigate different states. The most significant entertainer with regards to authenticity is the state. It is self-governing and unitary in light of the fact that it talks and acts with a solitary voice (Glassgold, 2012, p. 89). It is noticed that the intensity of the state is comprehended in regard to its military abilities, and in this way security concerns. Albeit all countries look for authority under authenticity as the main way to guarantee their own security, different states are boosted to forestall through adjusting the rise of a hegemon. There is use of judicious model of dynamic the states through getting and following up on precise and complete data. National intrigue controls the sovereign states as clarified in the terms of intensity. Since the single limitation of worldwide framework is the turmoil, none of the global specialists and the states are in reality left to their devises to give their own security. The impression of pragmatists that Sovereign states are the key entertainers in the global framework, prompts an exceptional consideration regarding huge powers as they are seen the most compelling on the worldwide stage. States are naturally fixated on security (cautious authenticity) or are forceful (hostile authenticity), and that regional spreading out is just obliged by restricting forces. Security issue result because of this forceful develop, with the end goal that expanding ones security may pass on along even expanded insecurity as a contradicting power sets up its own arms accordingly (Vu and Wongsurawat, 2009, p. 89). The issue is to such an extent that there is rivalry among the states to up their security because of feeling shaky yet toward the end none of the state has a sense of safety. There is a winding of weakness from the beginning. Thus, security transforms into a lose-lose situation in that lone relative increases can be made. Pragmatists acknowledge as obvious the way that there are

Nelson Mandela Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Nelson Mandela - Essay Example This paper would additionally rotate around these commitments done by Nelson Mandela (Guiloineau 2002) In 1961 a letter from Nelson Mandela expressed â€Å"I will keep battling for opportunity until the finish of my days† (Mandela 1990). This obviously demonstrated Nelson Mandela had faith in opportunity from his initial life. He got an actual existence detainment for the Rivonia preliminary in 1964 and was discharged in 1990. His commitment to his local nation can be connected back to his initial life when he got training in times when a large portion of the individuals in South Africa were uneducated. It was there in his school that he found out much about the political issues that South Africa was looking in those occasions. He at that point joined Congress and shaped the Youth class alongside his acquaintainces in 1944. The treacheries against the dark were expanding in South Africa as saw by Mandela in those occasions as the Whites were increasing more access to the nation afterWorld War II. Every one of these conditions caused Mandela to convince the board of trustees he shaped to go on strikes and common insubordinations against the administration for the improvement of the blacks. His battles at that point proceeded with which bore some natural product in those occasions yet he was captured in 1962 after he was found by police (Mandela 1990; Boehmer 2008). Mandela was kept for twenty seven years in jail and is known to be one of the longest detained opportunity extremist throughout the entire existence of the world. After his discharge from prison one could unmistakably observe his developing impact on the individuals of South Africa when a large number of individuals came to welcome him outside the prison. In the wake of being discharged from the prison he began his opportunity development again for the blacks of South Africa. He was the made the leader of African National Congress again in 1991. It was after the demise of an individual from ANC that presidential races were held again.The African National Congress won the presidential races and Mandela was

Who Should I Ask First To Write An Excellent Essay For Me

Natural Therapies Institute How To Hire Someone To Write A Good Essay For Me? If you usually don’t get high scores for your academic assignments, but you desperately need an excellent mark for your next essay, you may hire somebody else to compose it. â€Å"Who can write a good essay for me?† you may ask. There are many academic writers who will be glad to help you in exchange for money. However, you should be careful not to conduct a deal with a scammer. How to Select Your Writer Find a writer. To find academic writers, you may search for them both in your local area and or just google "write my college essay". Local writers can be found by looking through local newspapers ads and spreading the word among your acquaintances. Online writers often leave their contact details on popular websites for freelancers. Learn about a writer’s education. Contact a writer and ask them to show you copies of documents that will confirm that they’re well-educated and professional. This is a very important step because there are a lot of amateurs who claim to provide professional services and require good payment for their work. Look at a writer’s sample essays. To understand whether a writer’s style suits your order, you should ask them to show you their sample papers. This will also let you personally determine the competency level of a writer. Check a writer’s samples for grammar and spelling mistakes. Require testimonials. Professional essay writers get many grateful testimonials from their previous clients because they provide excellent services. Ask a writer to provide you with comments about their work to get more evidence of their reliability. Demand guarantees. Before you conduct a deal with a writer and part with your money, you should get assurances that they’ll provide you with an excellent plagiarism-free essay that will be written in accordance with the requirements stated in your order. Without such guarantees, you may receive a paper that won’t satisfy you and you won’t be able to get your money back. If you find several writers who are professional and reliable, compare them to each other and choose the one who offers lower prices or better terms. Hiring Academic Writing Companies You may contact not only individual writers but also entire agencies that provide services related to academic writing. You may get professional assistance and order papers on this website, for example. The advantage of using their services is that they have a large staff of writers which allows them to provide customers with papers of different difficulty levels on different topics. Expert admission essay writing service - get your essays written by professional application essay writer.

The French Revolution New Political Ideas and Revolutions - Free Essay Example

The French Revolution was a necessary revolution that gave the people of France their independence and a new form of government that was much needed. Before the French revolution, France was going through the Renaissance, which sparked some causes for the French Revolution. The government before the revolution was very unequal to the people of France, which sparked the revolution. One of the government issues to the people of France was the unequal Estate System. The Estate System represented three social orders of within French society: Estate-Clergy, Second Estate-Nobles, and Third Estate. The majority of the population of France was in the third estate and were forced to pay most of all of the taxes that came towards France. This being a problem was enhanced a ton when France’s debt came along because of participation in wars and the American Revolution. This lead to a massive debt which really angered the third estate. Also, this was when the Enlightenment was happening, a major part of the Renaissance. Many Philosophers wrote and spread many ideas of equality and voting rights. This further enhanced the movement of the third estate rebelling and causing the French Revolution to occur. The French Revolution was not just battling. There were several events leading up to the big battles and bigger events. The revolution took action when the National Assembly was formed. The starting events such as the Estates-General in May 1748 and the Storming of the Bastille caused the revolution to take action. Then the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen gained more support for the revolution by gaining the attention of the lower class which was the majority of France’s population. All of these smaller events lead to battles and war and played a major role in the revolution. The revolution permanently affected France in many ways such as social order and daily life. The French Revolution was most necessary for the people to fight for equality and justice. In the time period, 1750 to 1900s, the Industrial Revolution had started and spread rapidly. There were many new inventions such as the steam engine, cotton gin, and factories. As states industrialized over this time period, they expanded their existing overseas colonies in need for raw materials. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, there began an intense period of revolutions and rebellions over existing governments. One of these Revolutions was the French Revolution. The French Revolution had many causes leading up to this revolution such as France’s economic crisis and unfair taxes, Enlightenment ideas, and the Estate System. The French Revolution was necessary in order to help the people fight back to gain their equal rights, to create a new fair and just government, and so the people of France can live freely. Before the French revolution, the social structure of France was very noticeably unequal with its estate system. The estate system divided France’s society into three categories, First estate-Clergy, Second Estate-Nobles, and the Third Estate. The first estate owned an enormous amount of power-about a ruler’s amount of power, and they also owned a ton of land. The second estate didn’t own as much power, but enough to be in the high-class range, and they got all of the good paying jobs, like military and politicians. The third estate consisted of many subcategories and made up 98% of the French population. Some of those subcategories went from the bourgeois (highest) middle class,(middle) middle-class peasants, and (lowest) city workers. The sans-culottes however, (city workers) got the most work, were underpaid for it, and started to spread the unfairness of getting the most work and taxes.(The French Revolution 1789-1815, 2015) Now, the other two states had no t axes to pay and most of them lived the life of luxury and did not want anything to change. They didn’t want to change simply because of the fact that they are on top and do not have to go through any pain like the third estate is in right now. All of this inequality contributes to the fact that the France revolution needed to happen. These differences are gonna influence the French revolution in that it is showing clear separation of power with the unequal distribution of power. The Second Estate will soon want to be with the First estate, but not want to change the third estate because they do all of the work. This means that they want more power and land because of the greedy need but dont want the lower classes to change the state that theyre in right now. Now with their estate system at the state that it is currently at right now, (unequal) France will be going into economic debt and will need a way to pay it off. So just as essential knowledge, Europe is going through the Renaissance (rebirth) which will lead to a larger population; which created a greater demand for food and products. The discovery of new gold mines in Brazil had led to a general rise in prices throughout the West from about 1730, indicating a prosperous economic situation. However, from about 1770, this trend slackened, and economic crises, provoking alarm and revolts, became more frequent. (History SparkNotes, 2018) France was accompanying the 13 colonies with helping their American revolution. Which lead to Frances heavy military expenditures during the American Revolution, and were also involved in the Seven Years War; (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2018) resulted in a national debt of approximately four billion books in 1789. The country could not afford to meet i ts loan payments nor could it obtain more credit (History SparkNotes, 2018). When the French needed more money they started to tax the lower class, only the lower class they got 99% of the taxes. As if the lower class didn’t pay all the taxes but now they have to pay even more, and even Loui Xiv thought this was pretty unfair; so he decided to go to assemble the nobles which he called â€Å"The Assembly of Notables†. So Loui Xiv gathered the nobility and wanted to make a system in where they would have a nice balance in the taxation system, and it backfired on Loui. The nobility questioned their authority and they didn’t fix the government. All of this debt incoming towards France is a necessary cause for France because this just helped the Third Estate gain more rage. This supports why the French Revolution needed to happen because this inequality within the taxes and debt are all incoming towards the poor city workers. So with this economic debt at hand, with the lower class paying for it, and the nobles rebelling on Loui this just lead into the Enlightenment. So to start, the Enlightenment caused big changes in Europe, because of the philosophers ideas conveying throughout Europe. The Enlightenment was a development of thought, which led to increasing criticism of absolute monarchy and an interest in republican ideals. Philosophers like John Locke, Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, where just of the few that really influenced ideas like liberty, freedom of slaves, no more monarchies and more. John Locke emphasized contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government; â€Å"He argued that all of our ideas are ultimately derived from experience, and the knowledge of which we are capable is therefore severely limited in its scope and certainty.†( By Individual Philosopher John Locke, 2008). Also, Voltaire found inspiration in their ideals of a free and liberal society, along with freedom of religion and free commerce. (Julien Josset, 2008) Adam Smith as well believed in no slavery, wanted free religion and equal rights. Adam Smith devoted most of his time towards the economic ideas of the Enlightenment Era, as the idea of laissez-faire and the law of supply which created the basic concepts of modern economics. (Modern Economics) Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly believed in the goodness of man and in basic human rights founded upon universal natural law; he also believed that both rulers and the citizens have natural human rights as well as obligations to each other which should be bound in a social contract. (Julien Josset, 2008) Basically saying that people should have a say in government. Even though some of these philosophers didn’t originate from France, this just supports how many philosophers ideas were getting spread and where affecting revolutions. The reason why this really helped make France go into the Revolution. These philosophers posed many different, and also similar ideas, influencing France’s population to really think about absolutism. This â€Å"development† of Enlightenment thought led to increasing criticism of the absolute monarchy, an interest in republican ideals, critiqued the monarchy and the Catholic Church and examined democratic forms of government. The revolution started to take action with the National and Legislative Assembly. On May 17, 1748, there was a meeting of the Estates General, where there was a dispute over the voting structure. The nobles of the Second Estate demanded the use of one vote per estate, which would effectively void any vote of the Third Estate and the Third Estate refused to participate (French Revolution, 2018). These actions were necessary because the people of France wanted to be equal and be treated fairly. The cahiers of all three social distinctions saw the need for reform to the judiciary, taxation, and the Catholic church as well as it’s administration. The parish priests agreed with the reforms of the taxes, but they wanted to keep their power as the Catholic church (Mcphee,2006). Then there was a rumor about an aristocratic conspiracy to overthrow the Third Estate, and on July 14th, the uprising stormed the Bastille, and massacred the workers and freed the prisoners (French Revolutio n, 2018). The take-over of the Bastille helped the National Assembly gain more support by â€Å"patriots† started to take over and revolt against local governments (Mcphee, 2006). The Storming of the Bastille was necessary because it was a way for the people of France to revolt against the government and gain more support for their fight for justice and equality. Shortly after, on August 4, the National Assembly, desiring to satisfy the peasants, abolished serfdom and old feudal privileges. The National Assembly codified this as The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. As the revolution grew, Louis XVI allowed the National Assembly to grow and invited the clergy and nobles to join the National Assembly. In addition, King Louis XVI rejected the abolition of feudalism and The Declaration of the Rights of Man (French Revolution, 2018). This declaration was definitely necessary because the lower classes were no longer the lower classes, everyone was equal. T his gained support for the fight of equality and justice because it got the lower class involved which was the majority of the population. Eventually on October 21st, the National Assembly declared martial war. Over the next several months, the National Assembly passed a series of liberal reforms which proceeded to simplify France’s complex administrative system. The actions on the complex administrative system was necessary because it simplified the existing government and the people of Frances were making more progress to their fight for justice and equality. Frances On June 20th, 1790, the assembly officially abolished nobility. Louis and his family tried to escape to Paris but were caught and Louis was soon forced to accept the new Constitution of 1791 that provided for a limited monarchy (French Revolution, 2018). After King Louis was caught he was convicted of treason and was punished by execution. By King Louis being executed, it showed that the revolution was gaining in power and how powerful it was. In 1793, the Convention established the Committee of Public Safety which was a 12 man Committee that worked as the executive branch of the revolutionary government. Girondins and Montagnards were both included in this committee and in May, more moderate Girondins were purged from the Convention, and the more extreme Montagnards took control of the Convention and the Committee of Public Safety. Then the Montagnards used their power to identify their enemy in the revolution. The Committee of Public Safety was necessary because it united all the revolutionists together and progressed towards their goal of equality and justice. Under the direction of Maximilien Robespierre, the Committee of Public Safety executed tens of thousands of people by guillotine in the name of the revolution. At least 300,000 suspects were arrested, 17,000 were officially executed, and many died in prison or without trial (French Revolution, 2018). In addition, the Committee of Public Safety had to mobilize an entire society into a defensive position because they faced internal collapse and external defeat (Mcphee, 2006). The Committee of Public Safety was focused on increasing their size so they established a draft for all men between the ages of 18 and 25, which made the French army increase in size massively. Then the Convention abolished the Gregorian calendar which had Christian associations and replaced it with a more scientific calendar. In July 1794, the Convention overthrew Robespierre and put an end to the reign of terror which is known as the Thermidorian reaction (French Revolution, 2018). The Convention drew up a new constitution that established the French Directory which was governed by five directors and these five directors were chosen by a bicameral legislature divided into the Council of Five Hundred and an upper chamber of 250 ancients. In addition, the Directory was plagued by the same problems encountered by the Convention (French Revolution, 2018). Napoleon Bonaparte, a young republican artillery officer, who helped in the war overthrew the directory in a coup detat and in 1802, he appointed counsel for life and in 1804, he proclaimed himself emperor Napoleon I of France(Mcphee, 2006)(French Revolution, 2018). This war permanently affected France in many ways. For example, every France citizen was judged the same and taxed the same on wealth and more importantly land. Daily life was unchanged and women also remained unchanged with their rights before the revolution. A lot of lands was also changed due to the churchs loss of power, but farmers did benefit fro m this and were able to farm more(Mcphee, 2006). The French Revolution was a major turning point in French history in that it was a period where France was in a phase where it fixed itself. It was really necessary as those causation factors really pushed it to the point where it went to into phases during its Revolution. Phase One introduced the rage of the third estate, and how the first estate and second estate had to try to calm them down. However all of the problems were solved, and Phase three solidified it with a new constitution. With this new constitution, it established a new way of rule, a more equal way of rule, and with this new way of government or rule, it will establish a baseline for other societies to follow. When the Revolution ended, France was in a better state then it was than before and this is a great setup for current France. Sources: French Revolution. (2018). In World History: The Modern Era. Retrieved from https://worldhistory-abc-clio-xaaa.orc.scoolaid.net/Search/Display/309360 French Revolution. (2018). In Encyclopà ¦dia Britannica. Retrieved from https://school-eb-xaaa.orc.scoolaid.net/levels/high/article/French-Revolution/35357 MCPHEE, PETER. French Revolution. Europe 1789-1914: Encyclopedia of the Age of Industry and Empire, edited by John Merriman and Jay Winter, vol. 2, Charles Scribners Sons, 2006, pp. 884-899. World History in Context, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3446900325/WHIC?u=smithtownsid=WHICxid=4b14996f. French Revolution (2018). Frances Financial Crisis: 1783–1788Event Outline. Retrieved from https://www.sparknotes.com/history/european/frenchrev/section1/ The-philosophy.com(2017) ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHERS LIST retrieved from https://www.the-philosophy.com/enlightenment-philosophers-list AP World History (2012-2013)Effects of the French Revolution Retrieved from https://apworldhistory2012-2013.weebly.com/effects-of-the-french-revolution.html